Tuesday, April 26, 2011

#8 Treadway's Trials

In the midst of Wayne's life and trials, it is easy to lose sight of the hardship it also causes his parents. Most specifically, it is easy to ignore Treadway's plight as Wayne's father. Not to say that Treadway suffers in the same way that his son does, but he is indeed attempting to survive his own private hell, as it were. Once again, as it was while reading “The Doll's House,” it is important to consider the environment and culture in which our male/father character is immersed. Treadway is a stereotypical macho male hunter. If your home and livelihood revolve around spending extended periods of time in the wilderness, if in that kind of isolated environment you are most at home, if that kind of lifestyle/personality is expected of you...I feel that the emotional maturity and capacity to deal with the situation of Wayne would be an exception, not the rule. In the little Canadian town, things are black and white—not shades of gray. Wayne's birth definitely falls under the latter category. Treadway is simply not equipped to deal with it in a way that may be more acceptable to most of Annabel's audience.

However, I'd like to argue that Treadway tries; he really tries to come to grips with a situation that he does not understand in the least. He wants to protect his child and family first and foremost; wants them to be normal so as not to draw negative attention. His perceived indifference to his son's and wife's feelings is his only defense mechanism. But how can we not see how hard he is trying to comprehend when he organizes the synchronized backhoe number for his son? Even when he was tearing down the bridge, I felt pity mixed in with my anger at his action—how confused he must be. I am not dismissing some of his actions, just trying to understand them and give Treadway the fair trial he deserves.

It is really nothing new; we often forget the father, his emotions, and his potential suffering. And often times they suffer in silence.

Saturday, April 9, 2011

#7 Nobody's Perfect

I was thinking about the pressure put on today's mothers to be perfect and reflecting on the great quote our professor posted on her blog here . Lately, due to the increased number of friends and people I know getting married and having babies, I've been thinking about what kind of mother I will be--and frankly, it has been scaring the hell out of me. As a Type A perfectionist, it scares me thinking that basically, being a mom consists of learning on the job--and inevitable mistakes. What if I can't get my baby to stop crying? What if I mess up on the position my baby should be sleeping? What if I get impatient and yell? What if I let her/him get hurt? What if I make too many mistakes and just am not cut out to be a mom???

The quote on Professor Palko's blog calmed me down a bit; "blowing it as a mother every once in a while doesn't spell disaster for your kids' psyche. It just doesn't."

Popular MOTHERLOAD blog and Top 100 Mommyblogs author, Amy Wilson,  also made me feel better with her most recent post (see link above). Her little girl came into her room in the middle of the night wanting something to drink. Amy, being overtired, exasperatedly yelled at her to go back to bed, at which case, her daughter promptly ran to the bathroom and threw up. Later, Amy apologized to her daughter for yelling, and was properly chastised by the little girl for "not being nice."  *Sigh of relief*..One mistake every once in a while does not spell doom for your child, and it even seems that it can be some type of learning experience for both of you.

Although I have not totally quieted the anxiety in my heart about being a mother (and I doubt I ever will completely squash my perfectionist tendencies) it has reassured me to know that I cannot be expected to never make a mistake as a mother. It just does not happen. Nobody is perfect. Even Mom.


Friday, April 8, 2011

#6 Lessons From Deep Within the Tiger Den..

And Amy Chua is back in the news. The Yale law professor caused a stir this winter with the publishing of her book Battle Hymn of the Tiger Mother, a memoir about her strict, Chinese parenting style. Chua's children were not allowed play dates or sleepovers, watch TV or play video games, had to play violin or piano, and could not choose their own extra-curricular activities (these are only a few of the major bullet points in Chua's "Chinese parent" philosophy.) Professor Chua stated that this philosophy is the reason for the success and excellence Chinese children, the reason for the true stereotype of Chinese geniuses and math whizzes. She gave her children as proof of the success of her methods: her oldest daughter Sophia gave a performance in Carnegie hall at the age of 14, and her younger daughter Louisa is excelling on the same path as her older sister. Now, as if to further prove Chua's point, Sophia has just been accepted into Harvard. ...because of Amy's strict parenting techniques..???

The Battle Hymn of the Tiger Mother caused an uproar because of Chua's harsh tactics, often calling her children "garbage" , screaming at them for getting less than an A in school, and not worrying about her girls' self esteem.  Although I can hardly agree with her strategy, is there something to say for actually being the "parent" in the relationship with your child? Not her best friend? After all, best friend is not the role of the mother or father, is it?

http://www.thefrisky.com/post/246-the-tiger-mothers-daughter-gets-into-harvard-was-it-worth-it/

The above blog takes on a different view than the majority responses to Chua's memoir. And I think I agree with it. Professor Chua's take on parenting is harsh, to say the least, and I do not think that guilt and degradation should play a role in parenting, but it is a little refreshing in the age of no responsibility, to see parents actually being parents. Isn't that how it should be? Parents disciplining, loving--sometimes tough-love--demanding manners and hard work...not excusing horrible behavior and always coddling them?   My parents were always my parents first; "stricter" than many of my friends' parents. But now that I am grown and about to be on my own, I am so thankful for that. And my Mom and Dad are now my best friends.

What do you think? Is there a strand of truth in Amy Chua's stance on being the "parent" first?

Tuesday, April 5, 2011

#5 Not the 'Doll's House' of our childhood

Although we weren't assigned the entire reading of A Doll's House in class, I looked up the rest of the play and was even more disturbed. Around her husband, Nora acts like and is completely treated like a child. He delights in thinking that she is completely dependent on him, as something that would not survive without his constant instruction and indulgence.She is not comfortable talking about issues with 'Torvald', but instead tries to go behind his back, committing forgery, (which as a side note, was only because women weren't allowed to sign for themselves on loans--which opens a whole 'nother can of irritations for me..)  to make everything right. And then, instead of being understanding of what she had been trying to do, and thankful for doing it to save his life, Torvald belittles her. He calls her immoral, dishonest, and unfit to raise their children...until he finds out that her forgery will no longer embarrass him; then he professes how much he loves her, mostly because of how much she needs him. It is not until this moment that she realizes that she does not love him, and he does not love her--just himself. Ugh. No wonder Nora leaves.

I cannot, in my heart of hearts, be comfortable with a woman's decision to leaver her children...but I can get behind Nora's choice to leave her husband. But that is modern-day, independent me speaking. It is obvious that there is such an element of conformity and social pressure at work here; as much as I dislike Torvald by the end of the play, I feel sorry for him. He is a product of his environment, as is Nora's submissiveness to an unhappy life.

Betty Friedan's The Feminine Mystique examines the problems of Nora's unhappiness at length. In 1957, Ms. Friedan conducted a survey of her former Smith College classmates and found that many of them were unhappy in their marriage and role as housewives, dubbing it the "problem that has no name." She further went on to examine how there were two images of women promoted by men: happy housewives and unhappy career women--as if there was no middle ground. She noted that many women dropped out of college early to marry, afraid that if they waited too long or became too educated, they would never attract a husband.

The film "Mona Lisa Smile" is a perfect representation of this '50s mindset. Julia Roberts plays Ms. Watson, a young professor at Wellesley College, an all girls school in 1953. Ms. Watson strives to make it known to her young women students that they are capable of both career and family life; that they shouldn't settle for marriage just because society tells them too...

                               What Does it Mean?